Monday, September 24, 2007

Helen Clark and the media


This is one of many more stories likely to appear in the months to come. The question it asks is can Helen Clark win a fourth term for Labour?

There has surprisingly been no discussion of a succession to Helen Clark. This article sets up what are likely to be the terms of the narrative surrounding her leadership.

From The Press via stuff.co.nz:

"Combining David Lange's intelligence and frankness with ferocious discipline, she has dominated New Zealand's political stage as few before her.

On December 10, Clark marks her eighth year as Prime Minister.

Assuming the Government goes full-term (beyond mid-October next year), she could next year move into fifth place in the ranks of our longest-serving premiers – led by Richard Seddon, followed by William Massey, Keith Holyoake and Peter Fraser.

By then she will have led the Labour Party for nearly 15 years. She has been the most popular prime minister of modern times.

So an assessment of Clark's legacy may seem premature.

Aged just 57, she has her eyes on a fourth term next year – a feat if achieved that would place her government alongside Peter Fraser's as the only other Labour administration to have done so.

Early in her premiership, British Labour MP Austin Mitchell quipped that governing New Zealand didn't seem enough of a test for Clark's abilities, and suggested she take a subcontract role running Scotland or Norway.

Yet three terms on, Clark is facing a challenge even for her formidable skills.

Her government appears old and tired. Mired in minor scandal for much of the time since the last election, Clark has been forced to spend her time fighting fires."


Read more...

See also Colin Espiner's article on the topic

Wednesday, September 19, 2007

Murdoch and Dow Jones

From The Guardian:

Murdoch seeks $100m Dow Jones cuts
Chris Tryhorn and agencies
Tuesday September 18, 2007

"Rupert Murdoch is looking to make $100m (£50m) in savings at the Wall Street Journal's parent company, Dow Jones.

The chairman and chief executive of News Corporation told an investor conference today he intended to expand Dow Jones's revenue following the $5.6bn (£2.8bn) acquisition of the company, which was agreed in early August.

"We've already identified the low hanging fruit will be $100m in savings," Mr Murdoch told the conference in New York, in comments reported by Reuters. "But we're about expanding revenue." Mr Murdoch added that News Corp saw "nothing in sight" in terms of buying further assets."

Read more...

Facebook in the flesh

From The New yorker magazine (this is the whole article):
Social Studies
by Michael Schulman September 17, 2007
Jean Baudrillard, as any philosophy student will tell you, theorized that, in the postmodern world, “the territory no longer precedes the map.” In other words, if you are a member of N.Y.U.’s class of 2011, you probably arrived in New York City with a preĆ«xisting web of soon-to-be college friends from Facebook, the online social-networking site. You know which of them count “Harold and Kumar Go to White Castle” among their favorite movies, which are interested in punk rock or organic food, and which belong to such groups as “My Pimpin’ Is Immaculate, Hard Like Calculus!” and “I Went to a Public High School . . . Bitch.” You and your friends may or may not have actually met.

The peril in getting to know classmates on the computer is that incoming undergraduates may forget how to do so in real life. That was the thinking behind “Facebook in the Flesh,” a seminar held during N.Y.U.’s freshman orientation. “Meeting new people face-to-face can be . . . intimidating,” a brochure read. “This fun, interactive workshop will get everyone talking as we build social networks in person.” The session took place at the Kimmel Center—it was scheduled at the same time as “Dude, Where’s My Class?”—and drew about thirty-five students, who spent the initial minutes sitting side by side in uncomfortable silence. Eventually, two girls struck up a conversation and realized, to their delight, that they were both from Long Island. (“Suffolk County?” “Me, too!”)

“Here’s what in-person networking is,” David Schachter, an assistant dean, began. “It’s face-to-face. It’s brief. It works best when there’s virtually nothing at stake except a few minutes of someone else’s time. And it’s social. It happens in the same space.”

Schachter went on to describe the benefits of live interaction: “Is there a way that, perhaps, if you’re trying to find out what the great falafel place is, you might be able to do it through your social network?” No one mentioned that this can easily be done online. “What else do you think networking with peers can help you find out about?”

“Things to do?”

“Requirements you might have missed online?”

“Fascinating things about other people?”

Schachter asked the group to pair off, with the goal of conducting a casual six-minute conversation. He handed out a worksheet with pointers (“Ask questions. Try to discover commonalities and/or connections with the other person”) and provided a few sample questions, in case of a jam. (“What drew you to N.Y.U.?” “What do you think of this workshop so far?”) A visitor was partnered with Mike Scolnic, whose interests, according to his Facebook profile, include shoes, football, and cool breezes on hot days.

“I’m a Facebook addict,” Scolnic said. “I already have nine hundred friends at N.Y.U. Facebook sent me a warning that said, ‘Stop friending people.’ ” (Friend, v.: to add to one’s roster of Facebook buddies.) “I guess I didn’t take it as seriously as I should have, because last week my account was disabled for four days.”

Life in the dorm, he said, has been odd. “In the elevator, people who I’m friends with will say hi to me and I’ll have no idea who they are. Don’t get me wrong, I think it is useful. I met two girls on Facebook who came over to our room once we got to N.Y.U. We hung out with them, we drank with them, we watched a movie. But for every situation where it helped me there’ve been, like, five or six that have just been really awkward.”

Schachter blew a whistle. “Thoughts? Feelings? Reactions?” he said. “Was it hard?”

“Harder than Facebook,” one girl said.

“If we were going to do this again, is there anything that you would do differently, what I call an ‘upgrade’ or an ‘enhancement’?”

“I wish we could poke people,” someone said. Schachter looked confused.

The student elaborated: “If you want to let someone know that you want to talk to them on Facebook, you poke them.”

“Got it,” Schachter said. “So is there a way to poke someone in person?”

A girl suggested shyly, “Smile at them?”

After the session, Schachter admitted that he had never been on Facebook. He said that when he was a freshman at N.Y.U., in 1978, he met his best friend while signing up for classes the first week of school. They hit it off, he recalled, when they started talking in the registration line and realized that they were both from Long Island.

Shameless self-promotion


Wednesday 26 september (see below) there will be a screening of a film I co-wrote and produced. The only justifiable reason to mention this here would be that I would argue that this is an example of alternative filmmaking but then we did receive a grant from Creative NZ/NZ Film Commission.



Some info about the film follow this


The film is about to be screened in several cities in the US as part of a festival called Independent Exposure.

Tuesday, September 18, 2007

The New York Times and the Internet

The New York Times is announcing that it is making available for free previously subscription only material. Since the New York Times has always led the trend in newspaper presence on the internet, it's an interesting development led, predictably, by advertising revenues.

"The New York Times will stop charging for access to parts of its Web site, effective at midnight Tuesday night... In addition to opening the entire site to all readers, The Times will also make available its archives from 1987 to the present without charge, as well as those from 1851 to 1922, which are in the public domain. There will be charges for some material from the period 1923 to 1986, and some will be free...What changed, The Times said, was that many more readers started coming to the site from search engines and links on other sites instead of coming directly to NYTimes.com. These indirect readers, unable to get access to articles behind the pay wall and less likely to pay subscription fees than the more loyal direct users, were seen as opportunities for more page views and increased advertising revenue."

Read more...

Press Release as News

Today in lecture I discussed the issue of press release used as news sources and especially as the only news source to cover a particular story.

Two examples in today's scoop.co.nz website:

1.Bishop Tamaki on Destiny's De-Registering (Press Release: Destiny New Zealand)
2. Fisheries: Hoki Certification Slammed By Environmental Groups (Press Release: Royal Forest And Bird Protection Society)

The point here is that despite the fact that the website clearly identifies the origins of the news (clearly organisations which have direct stakes in the matters) it gives the appearance of news.

Thursday, September 13, 2007

Mashups and American Politics

From Wired Magazine:

"Yahoo's Presidential 'Mashup Debate' Won't Support Mashups
By Sarah Lai Stirland 09.12.07 | 2:00 AM
Yahoo's Democratic debate later this week has been billed as "the first-ever online-only presidential mashup." But on the eve of the debate, Yahoo has decided not to support citizen remixing of the footage -- reducing the once-bold experiment to little more than a fancy online version of an on-demand cable television offering.
Mashups typically involve the combination of two disparate elements -- for example, metropolitan crime data and Google maps, or rapper Jay Z's The Black Album and the Beatles' The White Album -- to make new creations such as chicagocrime.org or Danger Mouse's The Grey Album.
To that end, Yahoo said as recently as Friday that it would upload the raw footage from the online debate to its own web-based video editing service Jumpcut, to make it easy for the footage to be spliced and diced as citizen editors saw fit. "Users will be able to create their own mashups and post the footage onto their websites afterwards -- that's for the hardcore fans who want to engage with this video," spokesman Brian Nelson told Wired News.
But on Monday, Nelson called back to say the company had changed its mind. Instead the "mashup page" will only lets citizens pick and choose which candidates they want to hear from on particular issues, by pointing and clicking on a web interface."

Read more...

This is a mashup (what's wrong with this image?):

Russell Brown on TVNZ

From Public Address blog (the post contains very good links to background information:

"Ralston also regards the present management as just another bunch of dupes who'll lose their heads when they fail to meet the board's performance targets, or when the government changes. I think he's missing a few things. The development and launch of tvnzondemand and the creation of TVNZ 6 and 7 have been pretty efficient. The wholesale loss of staff from Breakfast to TV3's forthcoming Sunrise has been fairly bizarre, but it would be wise to wait and see whether TV3 can actually turn a dollar out of a shared break TV audience, which was small enough anyway, before declaring a disaster.

The comparison with the Fraser era is telling: that was marked by some awful recruitment decisions -- which did far more damage than the flaps over star salaries -- and a damaging bout of feuding with major independent producers. Given TVNZ's long history of scorched earth and policy reversal under successive management regimes, the shift under Ellis has actually been fairly civilised. The likes of John Barnett -- whose company has done incredibly well for TVNZ -- are welcome back in the building, and seem comfortable being there. The endless discussion over rights issues continues, but it appears to be businesslike, rather than bitter, in tone.

But oddly enough, I agree with Ralston and Fraser's key points: TVNZ can't have the Ministry of Culture and Heritage sitting on its shoulder forever. There are legitimate expectations of a public broadcaster in fulfilling public policy goals. Freeview, as noted above, is one example. But sooner rather than later, a clear, independent role for TVNZ must be established. That doesn't necessarily mean a split or a sale of part of the business: the present management's demarcation of "public value" and "commercial value" in its activities represents a reasonable way of managing its duties. But whatever solution emerges will come from solid thinking about TVNZ's future; not from a repeat season of the soap opera."


Read more...

Facebook, Google, On-line community and privacy

Facebook profile will appear on Google searches:

"If you thought the news feed was a threat to your privacy, be warned: Facebook is announcing Public Search Listings today, meaning profiles will be searchable through Facebook, and soon turn up on Google, Yahoo and MSN Search.

As of tomorrow, search will be available through Facebook; users will then have one month to change their privacy settings before profiles get indexed by the major search engines. These results will include, at most, your name and profile picture."

Read more...

and here too...

NZ Herald, crime and online communities



NZ Herald explains its readers what Bebo is:

"What exactly is Bebo?
10:25AM Wednesday September 12, 2007
By Stacey Hunt

he question might horrify anyone aged under 20, for whom comments like "Are you on Bebo?" and "Oh yeah, I saw that on your Bebo page" are everyday phrases.

But some of the older generation remain in the dark - 15 per cent of the first 1000 people responding to today's poll on nzherald.co.nz had never heard of social networking sites.

Stacey Hunt explains all about the sites young people just cannot seem to live without.

What is it?

Providing a place where people can spend hours creating their own pages, finding friends, uploading photos and leaving comments for other people, social networking sites have attracted millions of users.

People can post blogs, leave messages for friends, upload photos and videos, adopt virtual pets, feed and play with friends virtual pets, give "luv", draw pictures on whiteboards and the list goes on."

Read more...

And this is why:

Judge issues internet warning in student murder case
A judge has warned people not to discuss the murder of Auckland Grammar School student Augustine Borrell on internet sites after a youth appeared in court today.

The 18-year-old was given name suppression and remanded in custody until next Thursday when his legal team are expected to apply for bail.

Judge Sarah Fleming emphasised the suppression order applied to websites as well as traditional media.

Supporters of the accused were at court this morning and said he was a "good guy".

The judge suppressed all details of the case, including discussion on networking sites.

The youth's arrest came after comments were posted on the popular Bebo website saying "i am real sory 4 tha incident" and "iv handed maself in"."

Read more...

And:

"Exclusive: Police probe murder claims on Bebo"

Read more...

Battle over images of the rugby world cup

TV3 has been fighting to protect its exclusive right to images to rugby world cup and has won.

"TV3 wins injunction against Sky over World Cup coverage
6:01PM Wednesday September 12, 2007
By Edward Gay

MediaWorks, owner of TV3, has won an interim injunction against Sky's coverage of the Rugby World Cup.

TV3 issued proceedings in the High Court today saying it believed Sky was in serious breach of the rules surrounding "fair dealing" in its use of footage.

A full hearing of the injunction will take place on Friday.

The ruling imposes a ban on Sky including TV3 Rugby World Cup footage on The Cup, Rugby Highlights (channel 33) and Sport 365 Highlights."

Read more...

Bill Raltson former TVNZ head of news speaks up

"Ralston criticises Clark for salary fiasco at TVNZ
| Sunday, 9 September 2007

Former TVNZ head of news Bill Ralston has tongue lashed politicians for their handling of the state broadcaster and singled out the Prime Minister for starting a chain of disastrous events.

In a Herald on Sunday opinion piece Ralston broke his silence about TVNZ.

"TVNZ can and does become a political football as puffed-up politicians use it to boost their own profile by grandstanding on its every mistake and attempting to embarrass the Government as a result," he wrote.

Ralston said the duel role of returning a profit and meeting charter obligations was failing; "In short TVNZ is dysfunctional because it's designed that."

Ralston said Prime Minister Helen Clark's position against large salaries for presenters cost the network millions and was a "major factor in bringing the place almost to its knees".

He said her stand against big payouts led to short term contracts which alienated presenters such as Paul Holmes who quit."

Read more...

TVNZ's Financial Results

TVNZ released its budget results:

Fewer viewers blamed for TVNZ loss
By MICHAEL FIELD - The Dominion Post | Tuesday, 11 September 2007

For the first time in its history, Television New Zealand will not be paying a dividend to taxpayers, after posting a $4.5 million loss - blaming shrinking audiences.

Chief executive Rick Ellis conceded the year to June had been a "somewhat monumental year", and while TVNZ forecast a profit next year, warned "we will not return to revenue levels any time soon".

TVNZ's financial results showed that one staff member - believed to be Mr Ellis - is paid between $670,000 and $680,000 a year. Five employees were paid more than $300,000 a year, down from nine last year.

Mr Ellis said TVNZ had made 125 redundancies in the financial year, including 45 people in management or leadership roles. Restructuring had cost $11.1 million, but had delivered future savings of about $17 million a year.

Advertising had softened after four big years, and in the latest financial year had fallen 6.5 per cent because of a drop in audience share."

Read more...

"Maharey defends TVNZ loss
NZPA | Tuesday, 11 September 2007:

Broadcasting Minister Steve Maharey took the flak for TVNZ's $4.5 million annual loss in Parliament today.

Yesterday the state-owned broadcaster released its financial results for the year to June 30, showing it had made an operating profit of $9.3 million on revenue of $375.2 million.

However a major restructure that saw the company shed about 150 staff - many receiving redundancy pay outs - cost the broadcaster $11.1 million, resulting in a $4.5 million loss after tax.

Advertising revenues for the year were down 6.5 percent to $312.8 million."

Read more...

Internet and spying

China denies role in NZ cyber attack
By HANK SCHOUTEN - The Dominion Post | Wednesday, 12 September 2007

The Chinese Government denies it is involved in attempts to hack into New Zealand Government computer systems - despite strong hints that its spies' activities had been detected.

The Security Intelligence Service has confirmed that its staff detected information has been stolen and software installed to take control of computer systems.

Prime Minister Helen Clark said yesterday that she had been assured "no classified information has been at risk at all". She would not elaborate on what was deemed classified information, except to say: "Now we have very smart people to provide protection every time an attack is tried. Obviously we learn from that."

She said officials knew who was responsible for the hacking.

SIS director Warren Tucker has suggested China was the culprit by referring to cyber attacks in Canada and Britain that have been linked to the Chinese military.

China has also been accused of targeting sensitive German, United States and French computer systems, including those in the office of German Chancellor Angela Merkel and US Defence and State Department networks.

Read more...

Wednesday, September 12, 2007

Colin Espiner and new technologies and NZ Politics

From The Press via stuff.co.nz:

"Texting Miss Clark
Colin Espiner in On The House | 11:39 am 11 September 2007

So Damien O’Connor offered his resignation to Prime Minister Helen Clark via text message. Isn’t technology wonderful? It kind of makes Brad Pitt’s dumping of Jennifer Aniston by fax look positively luddite.

Maybe O’Connor knew that Clark was a bit of a text fan. The Prime Minister’s abilities in this area are well known. She texted her parents after almost falling out of a light plane during the last election. She carried on quite a relationship by text with Grant Dalton during the America’s Cup campaign.

As O’Connor himself said this morning, a text message was the one way he knew of getting through to Clark.

One can imagine the conversation went something like:

O’Connor: “Hln sori i stffed up agn. Went bit ott with rgby & all. Shd rsgn. Rgds doc”

Clark: “Gr8 tks doc can use agnst u lata. Stay put 4 now cos cant find any1 else. Lol hc”"

Read more...

Friday, September 7, 2007

Ohio Paper Portrays Iranians As Cockroaches Fleeing Sewer



Read more...

Rugby world cup (the media event) starts


Interesting story about the conflict between the major news agencies and the IRB:

"A high-profile press event featuring Zinedine Zidane and the New Zealand All Blacks was hit today by a media reporting boycott instituted by news and picture agencies over Rugby World Cup coverage rights dispute.
An alliance of five international agencies - which includes Reuters, Associated Press and Agence France Presse - refused to distribute any copy, text or footage of the Adidas event to global media subscribers in a stand-off with governing body the IRB over media restrictions."
Read more...

Monday, September 3, 2007

"Freeview" as public television

An interview with Eric Kearsley from TVNZ that discusses the relationship between the new digital channels, and TVNZ's role as a public broadcaster

Carol Archie interview: Journalism and coverage of "Maori issues"

A National radio interview with Carol Archie, author of 'Pou Korero: Journalists' Guide to Maori and Current Affairs,' that would be excellent preparation for Sue Abel's lecture next week.

See also this discussion of the book launch

Friday, August 31, 2007

ATT vs Pearl Jam

And the broadcast went silent for a while:



Save the Internet:

"Over the weekend AT&T gave us a glimpse of their plans for the Web when they censored a Pearl Jam performance that didn’t meet their standard of “Internet freedom.”

During the live Lollapalooza Webcast of a concert by the Seattle-based super-group, the telco giant muted lead singer Eddie Vedder just as he launched into a lyric against President George Bush. The lines — “George Bush, leave this world alone” and “George Bush find yourself another home” were somehow lost in the mix.


Pearl Jam: Seen But Not Heard

“What happened to us this weekend was a wake up call, and it’s about something much bigger than the censorship of a rock band,” Pearl Jam band members stated in a release following the incident.

Indeed. AT&T routinely rails against Net Neutrality as a “solution without a problem.” They say Net Neutrality regulations aren’t necessary because they wouldn’t dare interfere with online content. At the same time they tout plans to become gatekeepers to the Web with public relations bromides about “shaping” Web traffic to better serve the needs of an evolving Internet."

Read more...


ATT says it was an error:



"Lyrics sung by Pearl Jam criticizing President Bush during a concert last weekend in Chicago should not have been censored during a Webcast by AT&T, a company spokesman said Thursday.

AT&T, through its Blue Room entertainment site, offered a Webcast of the band's headlining performance Sunday at the Lollapalooza concert. The event was shown with a brief delay so the company could bleep out excessive profanity or nudity.

But monitors hired by AT&T through a vendor also cut two lines from a song to the tune of ''Another Brick in the Wall'' by Pink Floyd. One was ''George Bush leave this world alone,'' and the other was ''George Bush find yourself another home,'' according to the band's Web site.

The AT&T spokesman, Michael Coe, said that the silencing was a mistake and that the company was working with the vendor that produces the Webcasts to avoid future misunderstandings."

More on net neutrality

Not exactly recent but useful, from The Washington Post:

"No Tolls on The Internet
By Lawrence Lessig and Robert W. McChesney
Thursday, June 8, 2006; Page A23

Congress is about to cast a historic vote on the future of the Internet. It will decide whether the Internet remains a free and open technology fostering innovation, economic growth and democratic communication, or instead becomes the property of cable and phone companies that can put toll booths at every on-ramp and exit on the information superhighway.

At the center of the debate is the most important public policy you've probably never heard of: "network neutrality." Net neutrality means simply that all like Internet content must be treated alike and move at the same speed over the network. The owners of the Internet's wires cannot discriminate. This is the simple but brilliant "end-to-end" design of the Internet that has made it such a powerful force for economic and social good: All of the intelligence and control is held by producers and users, not the networks that connect them."

Read the rest...

See also...

And a case of the immediate implication of the loss of net netreality: Pearl Jam vs ATT...

Alternative to media concentration in the US

From Bill Moyer's journal on American public television:

"Media consolidation isn't widely covered by the mainstream press, but potential changes being considered to the rules governing the nation's big media companies could have far reaching effects on democracy. In 1984 the number of companies owning controlling interest in America's media was 50 — today that number is six. The Federal Communications Commission is once again considering whether to revise media ownership rules and let these media conglomerates get even bigger. This week Bill Moyers talks with FCC Commissioner Michael J. Copps about media ownership rules, the debate over net neutrality."

Read a transcript, follow interesting links and watch the video...

Thursday, August 30, 2007

TVNZ to increase Maori Programming

This is from a TVNZ press release published on scoop.co.nz:

"TVNZ wants to significantly increase Maori programming
TVNZ has today unveiled a plan to significantly increase the presence of Maori programming on the national television public broadcaster...Mr Latch said at the moment TV ONE and TV 2 showed 167 hours of Maori programming. Under the new strategy that would go to 300 hours on TV ONE and TV 2, plus another 190 hours on TVNZ 6 and TVNZ 7."

Read more...

Flight of the Conchords goes Frenchy

Wednesday, August 29, 2007

Russell Brown in the Listener on the Wikipedia edits

"A fraction too much friction
by Russell Brown

It took an American student to show us why Wikipedia should never be taken as gospel.

The appearance of the Wikipedia Scanner – a web-based tool that has disgorged an apparently endless list of self-interested interventions in the online encyclopedia by organisations as diverse as the CIA, Amnesty Inter‑national, Fox News and the voting-machine maker Diebold – has rightly generated global media interest.

But many reports missed the fact that it has always been possible to do what American student Virgil Griffith did with this new tool. Anyone can edit Wikipedia, but anyone making a change anonymously will have their IP (internet protocol) address logged against the change they have made. An investigator with a modicum of technical skill can easily trace the IP address back to its source."

Read more...

Sunday, August 26, 2007

Pirate Bay vs Hollywood



From The Guardian:

"Operating under the sign of a Jolly Roger, The Pirate Bay website hopes to evoke a buccaneer spirit: swashbuckling swordsmen, or perhaps the pirate radio stations of the 1960s. But as the internet's number one destination for illegal downloads, it has raised the hackles of the entertainment industry and elevated its founders to the top of Hollywood's most wanted list.

With more than two million visitors every day, The Pirate Bay has become one of the sharpest thorns in the side of the media business. Its controversial success has caused havoc in the music, TV and film industries.

Current top downloads include The Bourne Ultimatum, Die Hard 4.0 and Knocked Up — all showing in British cinemas, but available to watch on a computer screen for those willing to take the risk.

The three-year campaign to bring down the website is almost an epic of Hollywood proportions, sprinkled with high-flying lawyers and accusations of political extremism. And yet, so far, the chase has failed to bring the pirates down."

Read more...

More editing at Wikipedia



From stuff.co.nz:

"If you believe the NSW Premier's Department's version of history, a profanity-laden outburst Morris Iemma had at a media conference last year never happened."

Red more...

Friday, August 24, 2007

Digital Television in Aotearoa discussed on National Radio

Dave Gibbson and Russell Brown on Nine to Noon discuss digital television.

Listen here...

Adbusters and Murdoch

From alternative media magazine adbusters:

The Resistible Rise of Rupert Murdoch
From Adbusters #73, Aug-Sep 2007

Ever since he burst into Britain four decades ago by snapping the country’s largest newspaper out from underneath his competitors, Rupert Murdoch has come to secure a firm and powerful grip around the throat of the United Kingdom’s media. The Australian-born, self-described “billionaire tyrant” now controls nearly 40 percent of the national press, owns one of the world’s biggest book publishers, and has monopoly control over the country’s satellite television service.

But as Murdoch continues to exploit his power to exert political and personal influence, his growing hold on the media has become increasingly controversial and unpopular with the UK public. When Murdoch’s BSkyB television service recently swooped in to acquire a sizable stake of ITV, the largest free-to-air commercial television channel in the nation, media activists, regulatory bodies and even the government are all saying the “Dirty Digger” has gone too far.

Murdoch is known as an extremely hands-on proprietor, choosing editors who follow his orders and political dictates. “Every media property Murdoch has owned has been put to his political purposes,” said Ben Bagdikian, author of The Media Monopoly, “as is demonstrated by how he uses the Fox networks to project right-wing politics into news and commentary and to cheapen the national culture.” The same is true of his UK newspapers."

Read more...

Hell Pizza



From stuff.co.nz:

"The Hell pizza chain is removing its billboards of Hitler saluting with a pizza slice after complaints from the Jewish community.
The chain, which has had a string of complaints about its advertising, including a condom mailout last year, said the Hitler billboards in Auckland, Wellington and Christchurch were meant to lampoon Hitler rather than be offensive.
The Nazi leader is shown in a Heil Hitler salute with pizza in his hand, next to his quote: "It is possible to make people believe that heaven is hell."
Yesterday afternoon the Hitler billboard in Christchurch's Lincoln Road was replaced with another one in the chain's famous-quotes campaign – Pope Benedict saying "Hell is real and eternal".
Kirk MacGibbon, from Cinderella, the Auckland agency that handles the chain's advertising, said yesterday he had received three complaints from Jewish people in Auckland who were offended by the Hitler billboard.
Some had lost family members in the Holocaust."

Read more...

Hell Pizza is well-known for its use of advertising strategies which are often reminiscent of alternative media approaches such as remixing (see lecture on week 9). Usually this means taking a brand or an icon and re-contextualising it in such a way that it is used to speak against itself. See the unwoosher from adbusters.

Tuesday, August 21, 2007

Blu Ray vs HD DVD?

...it's all being decided now. In passing earlier in the trimester I made reference to Blu-Ray technology (what is it?, or here)which is to replace the traditional DVD. The article mentioned below suggests that Blu-Ray might be losing the battle not because it's not the better technology.

From The New York Times:

"The competition between Blu-ray and HD DVD has kept confused consumers from rushing to buy new DVD players until they can determine which format will dominate the market.

Until recently, many consumers were able to defer the choice because players have been so expensive. But prices have been slashed by about half -- Sony Corp.'s Blu-ray player now sells for $499, and Toshiba Corp.'s cheapest HD DVD player sells for $299, with both likely to include as many as five free movies as an incentive...

Andy Parsons, chairman of the Blu-ray Disc Association trade group, questioned the studios' decision to adopt HD DVD over Blu-ray, saying price differences between players have diminished in recent months. He said the trend ''is on its way to eliminating any perceived cost advantage the HD DVD format has claimed to have.''

Blu-ray discs can hold more data -- 50 gigabytes compared with HD DVD's 30 GB -- but the technology requires new manufacturing techniques and factories, boosting initial costs.

HD DVDs, on the other hand, are essentially DVDs on steroids, meaning movie studios can turn to existing assembly lines to produce them in mass.

Studios and retailers have been choosing sides in recent months."

Read more...

Sunday, August 19, 2007

And for a NZ connection to the Wikipedia editing findings

From Russell Brown's public address blog:

"I looked up some IP addresses logged against dodgy edits of New Zealand Wikipedia articles -- the old-fashioned way, rather than with the scanner -- but didn't find anything of interest. Part of the problem is that addresses here tend to resolve to third parties: so there's a bit of vandalism on the Helen Clark article from an IP address in the same block as the National Party's mail server -- but it's also the same block (controlled by dts.net.nz) as the Parliamentary web server, which doesn't tell you much."

Read more...

More Corporate Edits on Wikipedia

Following the item on Fox News editing Wikipedia entries here is an article from The New York Times describing the extensive practice from Corporations:

"Last year a Wikipedia visitor edited the entry for the SeaWorld theme parks to change all mentions of “orcas” to “killer whales,” insisting that this was a more accurate name for the species.

There was another, unexplained edit: a paragraph about criticism of SeaWorld’s “lack of respect toward its orcas” disappeared. Both changes, it turns out, originated at a computer at Anheuser-Busch, SeaWorld’s owner.

Dozens of similar examples of insider editing came to light last week through WikiScanner, a new Web site that traces the source of millions of changes to Wikipedia, the popular online encyclopedia that anyone can edit.

The site, wikiscanner.virgil.gr, created by a computer science graduate student, cross-references an edited entry on Wikipedia with the owner of the computer network where the change originated, using the Internet protocol address of the editor’s network. The address information was already available on Wikipedia, but the new site makes it much easier to connect those numbers with the names of network owners.

Since Wired News first wrote about WikiScanner last week, Internet users have spotted plenty of interesting changes to Wikipedia by people at nonprofit groups and government entities like the Central Intelligence Agency. Many of the most obviously self-interested edits have come from corporate networks"

Read more...


And here's the article from Wired magazine referred above...

The Sunday Star Times explains Facebook

"The most recent public web craze is social networking, where people are cyberconnecting by the millions. Danielle Murray explains the pitfalls and plusses of Facebook.

"Oh, MySpace and Bebo are so last year," says my niece in that smug dismissive teenage way.

"I'm on Facebook now."

Six months ago, if you hadn't heard of Facebook, it probably meant you were older than 25."

Read more...

Friday, August 17, 2007

Fox News and Wikipedia

Fox News has admitted it has edited entries from wikipedia which it did not find to its advantage or altered them in order to attack their opponents.


Read more...

See also this...

Fairfax Media

From scoop.co.nz (owned by Fairfax media):

"Fairfax Media has strengthened its position as the country’s most influential media company with the number of New Zealanders being reached by its newspapers, magazines and online platforms increasing.

The latest Nielsen readership survey ending June 2007 for newspapers and magazines show Fairfax Media print publications are read by 2.7 million or 84.6%1 of New Zealanders aged 15 years+, an increase of 60,000 readers year on year. "

Read more...

Thursday, August 16, 2007

Music fans' cell phones as marketing tools

From The New York Times:

"The modern mobile phone — equipped with camera, Internet access and more — has proved to be a liability for some performers, like Akon and BeyoncĆ©, whose regrettable moments were captured by fans and then immortalized on YouTube and similar sites. But for the fans themselves, mobile phones are becoming as important an accessory as an all-access wristband. Beyond using them to record a short souvenir, they are becoming a ticket to everything from free ringtones to V.I.P. treatment...

Even when there is no fee, the service comes at a price: fans must give their phone numbers to marketers. And purists — and some artists — disapprove of fans pecking out text messages or snapping pictures during performances. Still, the arrival of a new generation of phone-based activities could add a new twist to live events at a time when rising ticket prices have discouraged many concertgoers."

Read more...

Tuesday, August 14, 2007

Hone Harawira to pay back half of his fare to Australia

From NZPA via stuff.co.nz:

" Maori Party MP Hone Harawira has been ordered to pay back half of the cost of his taxpayer-funded airfare to Australia after he went walkabout while on an official parliamentary visit.

Speaker Margaret Wilson told MPs that Mr Harawira's "private visit" to the Northern Territory to see aboriginal communities had come halfway into a select committee visit to Melbourne.

MPs had an obligation to complete their work for which they received public funding, she said.

"As Mr Harawira participated in less than half of the committee's business I consider it appropriate that he refund half of the airfare that has been paid out of public funds," Ms Wilson said.

It has been estimated that the MPs' airfares cost $3000 for a business class return flight."

Read more...

And in a different story:

" Hone Harawira has struck back at the "petty and ridiculous" critics of his Australian walkabout, suggesting a whiff of hypocrisy in their sniping."

Read more...

Russell Brown discusses the impact of NZ political blogs

From The Listener:

"Key isn’t the first politician to claim to have been misquoted to get himself out of a fix. But in the old days, it wasn’t so easy for journalists to bite back – and certainly not as rapidly as Young did. Remarkably, it was the second week in a row in which Young, in the less formal setting of her blog, had produced the week’s big political story.

Her account of an interview conducted the previous week with David Benson-Pope (“he misled me as well”) appears to have triggered the end of Benson-Pope’s ministerial career. Again, Young hadn’t mucked about: her post appeared online only an hour or so after the minister had offered his revised account of the Setchell affair during question time in the House...

These blogs have emerged as part of a burst of blogging on the two main newspaper sites. Stuff has had the best of it so far: Dave Moore and Guy Somerset, the Dominion Post’s motoring and books editors respectively, give every impression of having been unleashed, and tech commentator Juha Saarinen, recently hired by Fairfax Digital Media, has brought his popular Techsploder blog with him."

Read more...

Monday, August 13, 2007

"What we call news"

Jordan from the class pointed this out:

MediaWorks (TV3, C4) sold to Australian Private Equity Company

This took place a couple of weeks ago. From The NZ Herald:
"Australian private equity firm Ironbridge Capital rushed to make a higher takeover bid for the remainder of MediaWorks after another Australian media owner tried to snap up minority shareholders' stakes."
Read more...

What is a Private Equity company?

:At a base level, private equity funds raise money for companies in need of a capital infusion. In that respect, they're similar to investment banks. But while investment banks raise money by selling stocks or bonds on the public markets on behalf of client companies, private equity funds do it by raising cash from wealthy individuals and institutions like pension funds. In turn, they use this money to invest in companies.
In ideal situations, PE funds invest in underperforming companies, turn them around, and sell their stake at a profit some years later, often in the public markets. Sometimes private equity companies engage in "asset stripping," or breaking up a company and selling its assets separately in order to make their profit.
Venture capital and private equity are often used interchangeably. Strictly speaking, venture capital firms focus on funding promising new businesses, where private equity firms focus on generating value from established businesses through restructurings and better management."

From this site...

NZ Journalism Conference

The NZ Herald publishes the opening speech by Dr Judith McGregor

Read more...

Saturday, August 11, 2007

Coverage of Hone Harawira's trip to Nothern Territories

From stuff.co.nz (The Dominion Post):

" Where the bloody hell are you?
Maori Party MP Hone Harawira is in trouble after ditching a taxpayer- funded parliamentary trip to Melbourne to visit Aborigines in the Northern Territory instead.

Labour MP Shane Jones said Mr Harawira's tribe were alarmed at his disappearance and were saying: "SOS: A dingo's got our Hone".

His impromptu walkabout has left some MPs fuming – though Green MP Nandor Tanczos says he would have liked to have gone too.

Speaker of the House Margaret Wilson is investigating whether she can dock Mr Harawira's pay for the costs of the trip, which include accommodation in a luxury hotel and business-class airfares to Melbourne."


Read more...


I paid my own way - Harawira...

Maori Party break silence on Harawira's trip...

Uluru leader hails NZ MP

Walkabout MP not on his own, says backer

Greens back Harawira but others aren't happy...

Blog: Harawira's walkabout like an Agatha Christie novel...

Harawira goes walkabout in Australia...

Harawira supporters thin on ground...

TV3's coverage...

Changes to NZ Copyright Law

All mp3 players (including Ipod) have been breaking the law.

From The New Zealand Herald:

"Proposed law changes will make it legal to copy music for personal use, but anyone recording a favourite television programme will be able to keep it for only a few days.

It is now illegal to copy music from a CD or tape to another device such as an iPod or an MP3 player.

But Parliament's commerce select committee has changed the Copyright (New Technologies) Bill to make it legal to "format shift" - or copy - music from a CD to other devices if it is for personal use.

The committee has not changed rules that render shelves of dusty videotapes illegal.

The current law allows home videotaping from TV, but only if programmes are kept for "no longer than is reasonably necessary for viewing ... at a more convenient time". That provision will remain.

And MPs on the committee have specified that copying DVDs or videotapes on to a device such as an iPod should not be permitted.

International treaty obligations did not allow the law change to extend to copying films, the committee said, and it did not consider such copying to be widespread."

Read more...

Stuff.co.nz's coverage of the bill...



Here's the link to the bill...

Slate Magazine on Youtube

YouTube's Dark Side
HOW THE VIDEO-SHARING SITE STIFLES CREATIVITY.
By Nick Douglas:

"The Internet was supposed to make the video world egalitarian. No longer would an oligarchy of content providers—a few TV networks, a couple of major movie studios—control what we watch. The Web gives creative people a potential audience of millions, as well as countless venues to display their creations. But that's not how things turned out. Web video isn't an oligarchy, it's a dictatorship. You're either on YouTube or nobody's watching. This dominance has a downside: The popular misapprehension that YouTube and Web video are synonymous has limited our sense of what online video can be."

Read more...

Keith Ng and Internet adversting

From Public Address blog:

"The reason for their existence is contextual advertising. Advertisers will pay a premium for space in subject-specific sections, because those readers are easier to sell to. For example, if you're reading car reviews, you're more likely to be someone actually looking to buy a car, and so a car ad is worth more, because more sales are likely to result from it. Same with travel sections and airlines, etc."

Read more...

Reuters and Titanic

From Guardian:

"News agency Reuters has been forced to admit that footage it released last week purportedly showing Russian submersibles on the seabed of the North Pole actually came from the movie Titanic.

The images were reproduced around the world - including by the Guardian and Guardian Unlimited - alongside the story of Russia planting its flag below the North Pole on Thursday last week."

Read more...

Thursday, August 9, 2007

The Guardian reports Murdoch's complaints

From The Guardian:
"Rupert Murdoch has complained that his victorious three-month battle to buy the Wall Street Journal involved fending off criticism bearing a degree of vitriol usually reserved for "genocidal tyrants".

In his first detailed comments since securing a $5.6bn (£2.7bn) takeover of the Journal's publisher, Dow Jones, the media mogul revealed that he was seeking $50m in annual cost cuts - and was considering offering free access to the paper's website.

"The Wall Street Journal is the greatest newspaper in America and one of the greatest in the world," said Mr Murdoch, insisting that he would be hiring - rather than firing - staff. The paper had "tremendous" journalists and a valuable brand. "That's why we put such a premium on it and why I spent the better part of the last three months enduring criticism normally levelled at a genocidal tyrant."

Read more...

The building of a media conglomerate

From The New York Times:

"The video rental chain Blockbuster said yesterday that it had acquired the Internet movie provider Movielink to offer video downloading services to customers.
Blockbuster is also acquiring rights to show the films of Movie- link’s owners, which include Warner Brothers Studios, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer and Paramount Pictures, it said. Financial terms were not disclosed.
“It immediately puts us in the digital download business,” Blockbuster’s chief executive, James W. Keyes, said. “Clearly, our customers have responded favorably to having other convenient ways to access movies and entertainment.”
The purchase provides Blockbuster with a way to send movies straight into televisions and computers, complementing its store and movie-by-mail operations, where it competes with Netflix."

Read more...

Tuesday, August 7, 2007

Colin Espiner's blog, Labour and Key



As part of its strategy to make stuff.co.nz a platform for many of Fairfax media activities the site has launched several new blogs including one by Political Editor of the Christchurch Press, Colin Espiner.

Following the National Party Convention this weekend and the official countdown to the next election, Labour is launching a new series of attack on Key:
"Labour’s policy of quietly ignoring National’s bushy-tailed leader John Key and hoping he would go away came to a spectacular end in Parliament today, with no less than three senior ministers having a piece of him over three seperate issues.

Defence Minister Phil Goff reckons Key’s told porkies over his stance on the war in Iraq, and produced transcripts of media interviews to back his claims. And certainly if the reported comments he gave to the Rodney Times back in 2003 are correct, Key has shifted his position on the war a long way.

He told the Rodney Times: “Blood is thicker than water and we should stick with the family which has supported us in the past and will support us in the future.” In other words, where America goes, we go.

If there were any doubt, Key followed up by saying: “I know it might not be a popular decision, but at the end of the day we have to look to the future and that isn’t with some Franco-German coalition.”

Read more...

Blair, Murdoch and Alastair Campbell



Alastair Campbell was Tony Blair's Director of Communications and Strategy (press secretary) from 1997 to 2003. He was in charge of putting together the public case for the war in Iraq and clearly was aware that some of the information was of very dubious origins. A BBC reporter got hold of some inside information about the manufacturing of evidence and his source was later revealed by the government. The whistle-blower, Dr David Kelly committed suicide and an inquiry was later launched (the Hutton Report) which laid blame essentially on the BBC. Campbell resigned in 2003 and has recently published his diaries.

This week-end he published a guest editorial at The New York Times entitled "Don’t Be Afraid of Rupert Murdoch" in which he writes:

"That standards in British newspapers have fallen in recent years is in my view beyond dispute, and in that Mr. Murdoch has been so dominant in the marketplace, clearly he has to be somewhere in the mix when it comes to handing out the blame. But to pretend, as some seek to, that he is somehow single-handedly responsible for all that is bad in our news media is not just intellectually lazy — it also misses the point...

But in the advanced democracies, though power structures have changed, elected leaders continue to hold enormous power. Mr. Murdoch is a huge global media player. If politicians are intimidated by him, that is their problem. If they make the wrong calls out of fear of his editorial wrath, they shouldn’t have been elected in the first place. And if journalists don’t like working for him, there are more media jobs now than at any time in the history of humankind. He was involved in making that happen, too."

Read more...


The Guardian has published an interesting response to Campbell's editorial "Alas, Alastair, if only you'd heeded your own advice":
"The New York Times piece appears under the wondrous headline "Don't be afraid of Rupert Murdoch". Campbell's unique brand of unconscious irony has always been enjoyable. It might be a sports column in which he mentions in passing an exchange with Clinton, to whom Campbell said fawningly what a privilege it had been to work with "the greatest all-round political communicator of the late 20th century", eliciting the reply "that it had been a pleasure working with the best communications adviser in the world". What a pair of lads, to be sure!...
What Campbell says about Murdoch is again exquisite in its unconsciousness. Would Tony Blair have lost the 1997 election "if the Sun had stayed with the Tories?" he writes, and answers, "I don't think so". He is quite right, in my view, but he doesn't begin to see the implications of that. From the start, Blair was always the suitor, cap in hand as he begged Murdoch's favour in a manner both humiliating and quite unnecessary.

Their relationship became much more intimate than almost any of us realised, with Murdoch what Lance Price (a sometime spin paramedic in Campbell's Downing Street team) called the invisible 24th member of the Blair cabinet. We have only just learned about the series of telephone calls between Blair and Murdoch just before the invasion of Iraq, when Blair was much more concerned about the opinion, and support, of the media magnate than of any member of his own government."
Read more...

Monday, August 6, 2007

Mediawatch on Murdoch and other interesting things

This week's Mediawatch program delves into blogs and politics and Murdoch's acquisition of Dow Jones.

Listen to the show here...

Changing Nature of News

From The Press on 16 April 2007:

"The EPMU's national secretary, Andrew Little, says New Zealand journalism is "under attack" and that the public should be worried about the quality and breadth of the news and information it can expect to receive. Appropriately, given that prediction, the union chose Black Friday to launch its "OurMedia!" campaign on the steps of APN's corporate headquarters in Auckland. "Irrespective of populist views about journalists," says Little, "we are reliant on good reporting and good broadcasting for understanding of what is happening in our communities and promoting public debate on important issues. This is an issue the wider public needs to understand."

Under APN's outsourcing proposal, for example, news and other copy from the company's provincial papers (including in Whangarei, Tauranga, Hawkes Bay, Rotorua and Wanganui) would be sub-edited, along with that of the Herald and the Listener magazine, by a pool working in what the union predicts will be a "factory-like" set-up somewhere in Auckland's industrial outlands. It is, Little argues, a recipe for mistakes and loss of local colour and distinctiveness, a short-term money saver that long term will inevitably "dumb down" the product and undermine the public's confidence in what they are reading.

"But the key decision-makers are in Australia. They don't have the local connections," he says."

Read more...

Website of EPMU, the trade union fighting the sub-editing contracts

Saturday, August 4, 2007

Australian Labor Leader and FM Radio

Adam Swift pointed this up. As the campaign for the next elections in Australia are well under way, the Labour Party is fonding ways to reach younger viewers. From The Australian:

"OPPOSITION Leader Kevin Rudd appeared last Thursday as a special guest on the Nova FM breakfast program in Sydney. He was wired to an electric-shock machine.

His ebullient hosts, the duo known as Merrick and Rosso, asked him to take part in a freewheeling, unscripted and, let's face it, potentially catastrophic test in which Rudd would get a short, sharp electric shock if he failed to correctly answer one of the questions put to him.

Rudd managed quite well but then missed a beat. He got a jolt and nearly fell off his chair, laughing. Once he'd recovered, he immediately asked the hosts if they could get John Howard on the program, wire him up to the shock machine, turn up the voltage and really give the Prime Minister a jolt.

In fact, the shock machine is hardly necessary: confidential internal government polling and last week's Newspoll clearly show young voters are preparing to give Howard an extremely high voltage poke with the cattle prod.

The Newspoll showed 53 per cent of voters aged up to 34 would support Labor at the coming election. The Coalition had just 30 per cent of these votes, a drop of 10 percentage points."

Read more...

The Australian on Murdoch

FCC Commissioner Michael Copps is saying:

"This deal means more media consolidation and fewer independent voices, and it specifically affects the local market in New York City…What's good for shareholders of huge media conglomerates isn't always what's good for the public interest or our civic dialogue...We should immediately conduct a careful factual and legal analysis of the transaction to determine how it implicates specific FCC rules and our overarching statutory obligation to protect the public interest. I hope nobody views this as a slam dunk."

Read more...

Friday, August 3, 2007

Democracy Now on Murdoch's purchase of Dow Jones

From a broadcast of Democarcy Now:

"AMY GOODMAN: On this issue of media consolidation, I wanted to bring in Craig Aaron, spokesperson for Free Press in Chicago. Craig, can you talk about what this means in the media landscape right now, the number of holdings that Rupert Murdoch has?

CRAIG AARON: Well, you know, it’s an immense amount of holdings at this point. You know, several decades ago, there might have been fifty corporations that controlled what we see, hear, watch every day. Now we’re down to probably about five that really dominate the vast majority of information and news. And so, this gives one company and one man an immense amount of power.

You know, if this deal goes all the way, which all indications are that it will, Murdoch will control, you know, a national broadcast network, a cable news channel and one of the few remaining daily newspapers that really set the national news agenda. So among this small handful of outlets that really set the agenda every day across the country in all the papers and all the local television stations, suddenly Rupert Murdoch, who is very clear he’s always going to put his personal ideology and his personal business interests before the quality of news, he’s going to have an incredible amount of influence over that news agenda."

Read more...

Listen to the show...

Thursday, August 2, 2007

Murdcoh buys Dow Jones and the Wall Street Journal


From The New York Times:

"Mr. Murdoch has shown in the past that he is willing to experiment, even knock over some sacred cows. In an interview with The Times earlier this year, Mr. Murdoch mused aloud about The Journal, saying, for instance, that he did not have time to read longer articles during the week and might like to swap out the paper’s Pursuits section on Saturdays with a glossy magazine. More recently, he told Time magazine that he was not sure about the offbeat front-page stories known internally as “A-Heds” that are a plum for reporters to write."

Read more...

Wednesday, August 1, 2007

Murdoch and The Wall Street Journal

From The New York Times:

"Murdoch Seen to Win Control of Dow Jones
Rupert Murdoch appeared today to have gained enough support from the deeply divided Bancroft family to buy Dow Jones & Company, publisher of The Wall Street Journal, for $5 billion...

For Mr. Murdoch, the prospect of acquiring The Journal represents the pinnacle of his long career building the News Corporation into a $28 billion global media empire that already includes more than 100 newspapers around the world, satellite broadcast operations, the Fox television network, the online social networking site MySpace and many other properties.

It also signals the end of an era for Dow Jones and the controlling Bancroft family, an intensely private clan that had allowed The Journal to operate independently and become one of the nation’s most prominent and trusted newspapers, even as its finances deteriorated.

The three dozen members of the Bancroft family had engaged in an intense debate about The Journal’s future. Some argued vociferously that Mr. Murdoch would damage the newspaper’s credibility, while others said that his offer was too good to pass up at a time when the newspaper industry has been struggling."

Read more...

Read also...

And from the Wall Street Journal where journalists have been very skeptical about the deal.

Tuesday, July 31, 2007

New Zealand on the Daily Show



The New Zealand Herald covers the story:

"One of America's most watched cable television shows has made of mockery of our politicians' attempts to ban satire of Parliament.

The Daily Show with Jon Stewart, which pulls an audience of 1.4 million each night, explained that New Zealand's government recently passed an order prohibiting broadcasters from using footage of lawmakers in their parliament for satire.

"This cannot stand. As we have done so often in the past, once again America to the rescue," says host Stewart."

Should this be in the entertainment section of the paper or in politics?