Sunday, September 30, 2007

Digital democracy in action?

Police wiki lets you write the law

From stuff.co.nz

It's said the powerful write their own laws, but now everyone can.

Due to a new wiki launched by New Zealand police, members of the public can now contribute to the drafting of the new policing act.

NZ Police Superintendent Hamish McCardle, the officer in charge of developing the new act, said the initiative had already been described as a "new frontier of democracy".

"People are calling it 'extreme democracy' and perhaps it is," he said.

"It's a novel move but when it comes to the principles that go into policing, the person on the street has a good idea ... as they are a customer," he said.

"They've got the best idea about how they want to be policed."

NZ Police were reviewing the old Policing Act, from 1958, which had become "anachronistic" and was "written for a completely different age, not policing of today", Superintendent McCardle said.

But drafting new legislation "shouldn't just be the sole reserve of politicians", he said, so the wiki was created to invite input from members of the public.

Social networks strategist Laurel Papworth, who writes a blogs on how online communities change the way society operates, said "participatory legislation" was a "great idea".

Read rest of article

Saturday, September 29, 2007

Working on John Key's image

This is from a blog called The Standard. A cameraman follows a camera crew following John Key in Porirua market. Two things of interest here: firstly this shows the ways in which political campaigns stage opportunities for candidates to look in the touch with the people; secondly, this is an example of alternative media strategy since this cameraman reveals the manufacturing of the situation.

Read more and watch the video

Thursday, September 27, 2007

Web 2.0 and music

This is a social network site for musicians so that they can collaborate on music projects.

Check the site...

Text messaging and advocacy groups

This is from The New York Times and about an American cell phone company but the article raises interesting questions about the extent to which text messaging can be used by advocacy groups and more generally its contribution to public debate:

"Saying it had the right to block “controversial or unsavory” text messages, Verizon Wireless has rejected a request from Naral Pro-Choice America, the abortion rights group, to make Verizon’s mobile network available for a text-message program.

The other leading wireless carriers have accepted the program, which allows people to sign up for text messages from Naral by sending a message to a five-digit number known as a short code.

Text messaging is a growing political tool in the United States and a dominant one abroad, and such sign-up programs are used by many political candidates and advocacy groups to send updates to supporters... The laws that forbid common carriers from interfering with voice transmissions on ordinary phone lines do not apply to text messages."

Read more...


And then Verizon changed its mind:

"The decision to not allow text messaging on an important, though sensitive, public policy issue was incorrect, and we have fixed the process that led to this isolated incident,” Jeffrey Nelson, a company spokesman, said in a statement.

“It was an incorrect interpretation of a dusty internal policy,” Mr. Nelson said. “That policy, developed before text messaging protections such as spam filters adequately protected customers from unwanted messages, was designed to ward against communications such as anonymous hate messaging and adult materials sent to children.”"

Read more...

Tuesday, September 25, 2007

Video of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad at Columbia University

The New York Times,The Washington Post and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad


Following the previous post and as constrast to Juan Cole's assertion that the demonization of the president of Iran is about preparing Americans for war against Iran, here's The New York Times report of Ahmadinejad's speech at Columbia University in New York:

"He said that there were no homosexuals in Iran — not one — and that the Nazi slaughter of six million Jews should not be treated as fact, but theory, and therefore open to debate and more research.
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the president of Iran, aired those and other bewildering thoughts in a two-hour verbal contest at Columbia University yesterday, providing some ammunition to people who said there was no point in inviting him to speak. Yet his appearance also offered evidence of why he is widely admired in the developing world for his defiance toward Western, especially American, power.
In repeated clashes with his hosts, Mr. Ahmadinejad accused the United States of supporting terrorist groups, and characterized as hypocritical American and European efforts to rein in Iran’s nuclear ambitions."

Read more...


And in the Washington Post a column by Dana Milbank. The title says it all "Live From New York, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's Unreality Show"

Read more...

Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad interviewed on American programme 60 minutes

From Crooks and Liars a report on the interview as well as copy of the video:

"60 Minutes’ Scott Pelley sat down with Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad for what can only be termed a surreal interview. Pelley was combative for most of the interview, White House talking points quite literally in hand. Ahmadinejad’s responses were frustratingly equivocal. It sparked a great debate in my home as to why…if Ahmadinejad does want to reach some sort of detente with the rising escalation of war rhetoric, his dancing around direct questions did not truly help him. But then again, Ahmadinejad’s smile also belied an annoyance with Pelley’s attitude, as his final comment indicated:

“This is not Guantanamo Bay. This is not a Baghdad prison. Please, this is not a secret prison in Europe. This is not Abu Ghraib,” Ahmadinejad said. “This is Iran. I’m the president of this country!”
Read more and watch the video

And here is an opinion piece from Salon.com: "Turning Ahmadinejad into public enemy No. 1" by Juan Cole:

"There is, in fact, remarkably little substance to the debates now raging in the United States about Ahmadinejad. His quirky personality, penchant for outrageous one-liners, and combative populism are hardly serious concerns for foreign policy. Taking potshots at a bantam cock of a populist like Ahmadinejad is actually a way of expressing another, deeper anxiety: fear of Iran's rising position as a regional power and its challenge to the American and Israeli status quo. The real reason his visit is controversial is that the American right has decided the United States needs to go to war against Iran. Ahmadinejad is therefore being configured as an enemy head of state."

Read more...

NZ Police's E-Crime Lab

Yesterday the police launched their Electronic Crime Strategy. According to stuff.co.nz, Police Commissioner Howard Broad described its necessity in the following terms: "Crime is being increasingly committed in what is effectively the cyberspace wild west, a borderless environment where traditional policing methods are often no longer effective. This is the high end of new electronic crime – cyber-crime: anonymous, borderless, fast, dynamic and incorporating ever-changing and sophisticated technologies."

Go here to read the rest of the article.

Go here for TV3's coverage, and here for National Radio's.

Web 2.0: The Machine Is Using Us



The video created by Professor Micheal Wesch as a graphic representation of Web 2.0.
You can go here to see an interview with Prof. Wesch in which he discusses making the video, and the response to it.

And here to see the video "The Internet Has a Face" which is also discussed in the interview.

Save The Internet

savetheinternet.com's discussion of net neutrality.
Go here for the website.


Microsoft seeking to buy stake in Facebook

From The Guardian

"It is the scourge of middle managers, who fear their employees spend too much time using it, and beloved by people with a penchant for gaining new friends and indulging in internet Scrabble.

Now Facebook, the phenomenally popular social networking site, is at the centre of financial speculation, which, if it comes to fruition could value a company set up three years ago by a Harvard dropout at a staggering $10bn (£5bn).

According to the Wall Street Journal, Microsoft is poised to buy a 5% stake in the firm for between $300m and $500m. That would make Facebook worth up to $10bn in all and turn its founder Mark Zuckerberg, 23, into one of the wealthiest men in California's Silicon Valley."

Read the rest of the article

YouTube and "cyber bullying"

YouTube attack shows emergence of cyber-bullying

From The Press

"An attack on a Dunedin student that was filmed and posted on YouTube is the latest in an emerging phenomenon of cyber bullying, schools say."

Read rest of article. One of the things to consider when reading accounts such as this (cyber bullying, text-bullying) is how the technology itself is often positioned as a determining factor in the events that take place.

Monday, September 24, 2007

Helen Clark and the media


This is one of many more stories likely to appear in the months to come. The question it asks is can Helen Clark win a fourth term for Labour?

There has surprisingly been no discussion of a succession to Helen Clark. This article sets up what are likely to be the terms of the narrative surrounding her leadership.

From The Press via stuff.co.nz:

"Combining David Lange's intelligence and frankness with ferocious discipline, she has dominated New Zealand's political stage as few before her.

On December 10, Clark marks her eighth year as Prime Minister.

Assuming the Government goes full-term (beyond mid-October next year), she could next year move into fifth place in the ranks of our longest-serving premiers – led by Richard Seddon, followed by William Massey, Keith Holyoake and Peter Fraser.

By then she will have led the Labour Party for nearly 15 years. She has been the most popular prime minister of modern times.

So an assessment of Clark's legacy may seem premature.

Aged just 57, she has her eyes on a fourth term next year – a feat if achieved that would place her government alongside Peter Fraser's as the only other Labour administration to have done so.

Early in her premiership, British Labour MP Austin Mitchell quipped that governing New Zealand didn't seem enough of a test for Clark's abilities, and suggested she take a subcontract role running Scotland or Norway.

Yet three terms on, Clark is facing a challenge even for her formidable skills.

Her government appears old and tired. Mired in minor scandal for much of the time since the last election, Clark has been forced to spend her time fighting fires."


Read more...

See also Colin Espiner's article on the topic

Wednesday, September 19, 2007

Murdoch and Dow Jones

From The Guardian:

Murdoch seeks $100m Dow Jones cuts
Chris Tryhorn and agencies
Tuesday September 18, 2007

"Rupert Murdoch is looking to make $100m (£50m) in savings at the Wall Street Journal's parent company, Dow Jones.

The chairman and chief executive of News Corporation told an investor conference today he intended to expand Dow Jones's revenue following the $5.6bn (£2.8bn) acquisition of the company, which was agreed in early August.

"We've already identified the low hanging fruit will be $100m in savings," Mr Murdoch told the conference in New York, in comments reported by Reuters. "But we're about expanding revenue." Mr Murdoch added that News Corp saw "nothing in sight" in terms of buying further assets."

Read more...

Facebook in the flesh

From The New yorker magazine (this is the whole article):
Social Studies
by Michael Schulman September 17, 2007
Jean Baudrillard, as any philosophy student will tell you, theorized that, in the postmodern world, “the territory no longer precedes the map.” In other words, if you are a member of N.Y.U.’s class of 2011, you probably arrived in New York City with a preëxisting web of soon-to-be college friends from Facebook, the online social-networking site. You know which of them count “Harold and Kumar Go to White Castle” among their favorite movies, which are interested in punk rock or organic food, and which belong to such groups as “My Pimpin’ Is Immaculate, Hard Like Calculus!” and “I Went to a Public High School . . . Bitch.” You and your friends may or may not have actually met.

The peril in getting to know classmates on the computer is that incoming undergraduates may forget how to do so in real life. That was the thinking behind “Facebook in the Flesh,” a seminar held during N.Y.U.’s freshman orientation. “Meeting new people face-to-face can be . . . intimidating,” a brochure read. “This fun, interactive workshop will get everyone talking as we build social networks in person.” The session took place at the Kimmel Center—it was scheduled at the same time as “Dude, Where’s My Class?”—and drew about thirty-five students, who spent the initial minutes sitting side by side in uncomfortable silence. Eventually, two girls struck up a conversation and realized, to their delight, that they were both from Long Island. (“Suffolk County?” “Me, too!”)

“Here’s what in-person networking is,” David Schachter, an assistant dean, began. “It’s face-to-face. It’s brief. It works best when there’s virtually nothing at stake except a few minutes of someone else’s time. And it’s social. It happens in the same space.”

Schachter went on to describe the benefits of live interaction: “Is there a way that, perhaps, if you’re trying to find out what the great falafel place is, you might be able to do it through your social network?” No one mentioned that this can easily be done online. “What else do you think networking with peers can help you find out about?”

“Things to do?”

“Requirements you might have missed online?”

“Fascinating things about other people?”

Schachter asked the group to pair off, with the goal of conducting a casual six-minute conversation. He handed out a worksheet with pointers (“Ask questions. Try to discover commonalities and/or connections with the other person”) and provided a few sample questions, in case of a jam. (“What drew you to N.Y.U.?” “What do you think of this workshop so far?”) A visitor was partnered with Mike Scolnic, whose interests, according to his Facebook profile, include shoes, football, and cool breezes on hot days.

“I’m a Facebook addict,” Scolnic said. “I already have nine hundred friends at N.Y.U. Facebook sent me a warning that said, ‘Stop friending people.’ ” (Friend, v.: to add to one’s roster of Facebook buddies.) “I guess I didn’t take it as seriously as I should have, because last week my account was disabled for four days.”

Life in the dorm, he said, has been odd. “In the elevator, people who I’m friends with will say hi to me and I’ll have no idea who they are. Don’t get me wrong, I think it is useful. I met two girls on Facebook who came over to our room once we got to N.Y.U. We hung out with them, we drank with them, we watched a movie. But for every situation where it helped me there’ve been, like, five or six that have just been really awkward.”

Schachter blew a whistle. “Thoughts? Feelings? Reactions?” he said. “Was it hard?”

“Harder than Facebook,” one girl said.

“If we were going to do this again, is there anything that you would do differently, what I call an ‘upgrade’ or an ‘enhancement’?”

“I wish we could poke people,” someone said. Schachter looked confused.

The student elaborated: “If you want to let someone know that you want to talk to them on Facebook, you poke them.”

“Got it,” Schachter said. “So is there a way to poke someone in person?”

A girl suggested shyly, “Smile at them?”

After the session, Schachter admitted that he had never been on Facebook. He said that when he was a freshman at N.Y.U., in 1978, he met his best friend while signing up for classes the first week of school. They hit it off, he recalled, when they started talking in the registration line and realized that they were both from Long Island.

Shameless self-promotion


Wednesday 26 september (see below) there will be a screening of a film I co-wrote and produced. The only justifiable reason to mention this here would be that I would argue that this is an example of alternative filmmaking but then we did receive a grant from Creative NZ/NZ Film Commission.



Some info about the film follow this


The film is about to be screened in several cities in the US as part of a festival called Independent Exposure.

Tuesday, September 18, 2007

The New York Times and the Internet

The New York Times is announcing that it is making available for free previously subscription only material. Since the New York Times has always led the trend in newspaper presence on the internet, it's an interesting development led, predictably, by advertising revenues.

"The New York Times will stop charging for access to parts of its Web site, effective at midnight Tuesday night... In addition to opening the entire site to all readers, The Times will also make available its archives from 1987 to the present without charge, as well as those from 1851 to 1922, which are in the public domain. There will be charges for some material from the period 1923 to 1986, and some will be free...What changed, The Times said, was that many more readers started coming to the site from search engines and links on other sites instead of coming directly to NYTimes.com. These indirect readers, unable to get access to articles behind the pay wall and less likely to pay subscription fees than the more loyal direct users, were seen as opportunities for more page views and increased advertising revenue."

Read more...

Press Release as News

Today in lecture I discussed the issue of press release used as news sources and especially as the only news source to cover a particular story.

Two examples in today's scoop.co.nz website:

1.Bishop Tamaki on Destiny's De-Registering (Press Release: Destiny New Zealand)
2. Fisheries: Hoki Certification Slammed By Environmental Groups (Press Release: Royal Forest And Bird Protection Society)

The point here is that despite the fact that the website clearly identifies the origins of the news (clearly organisations which have direct stakes in the matters) it gives the appearance of news.

Thursday, September 13, 2007

Mashups and American Politics

From Wired Magazine:

"Yahoo's Presidential 'Mashup Debate' Won't Support Mashups
By Sarah Lai Stirland 09.12.07 | 2:00 AM
Yahoo's Democratic debate later this week has been billed as "the first-ever online-only presidential mashup." But on the eve of the debate, Yahoo has decided not to support citizen remixing of the footage -- reducing the once-bold experiment to little more than a fancy online version of an on-demand cable television offering.
Mashups typically involve the combination of two disparate elements -- for example, metropolitan crime data and Google maps, or rapper Jay Z's The Black Album and the Beatles' The White Album -- to make new creations such as chicagocrime.org or Danger Mouse's The Grey Album.
To that end, Yahoo said as recently as Friday that it would upload the raw footage from the online debate to its own web-based video editing service Jumpcut, to make it easy for the footage to be spliced and diced as citizen editors saw fit. "Users will be able to create their own mashups and post the footage onto their websites afterwards -- that's for the hardcore fans who want to engage with this video," spokesman Brian Nelson told Wired News.
But on Monday, Nelson called back to say the company had changed its mind. Instead the "mashup page" will only lets citizens pick and choose which candidates they want to hear from on particular issues, by pointing and clicking on a web interface."

Read more...

This is a mashup (what's wrong with this image?):

Russell Brown on TVNZ

From Public Address blog (the post contains very good links to background information:

"Ralston also regards the present management as just another bunch of dupes who'll lose their heads when they fail to meet the board's performance targets, or when the government changes. I think he's missing a few things. The development and launch of tvnzondemand and the creation of TVNZ 6 and 7 have been pretty efficient. The wholesale loss of staff from Breakfast to TV3's forthcoming Sunrise has been fairly bizarre, but it would be wise to wait and see whether TV3 can actually turn a dollar out of a shared break TV audience, which was small enough anyway, before declaring a disaster.

The comparison with the Fraser era is telling: that was marked by some awful recruitment decisions -- which did far more damage than the flaps over star salaries -- and a damaging bout of feuding with major independent producers. Given TVNZ's long history of scorched earth and policy reversal under successive management regimes, the shift under Ellis has actually been fairly civilised. The likes of John Barnett -- whose company has done incredibly well for TVNZ -- are welcome back in the building, and seem comfortable being there. The endless discussion over rights issues continues, but it appears to be businesslike, rather than bitter, in tone.

But oddly enough, I agree with Ralston and Fraser's key points: TVNZ can't have the Ministry of Culture and Heritage sitting on its shoulder forever. There are legitimate expectations of a public broadcaster in fulfilling public policy goals. Freeview, as noted above, is one example. But sooner rather than later, a clear, independent role for TVNZ must be established. That doesn't necessarily mean a split or a sale of part of the business: the present management's demarcation of "public value" and "commercial value" in its activities represents a reasonable way of managing its duties. But whatever solution emerges will come from solid thinking about TVNZ's future; not from a repeat season of the soap opera."


Read more...

Facebook, Google, On-line community and privacy

Facebook profile will appear on Google searches:

"If you thought the news feed was a threat to your privacy, be warned: Facebook is announcing Public Search Listings today, meaning profiles will be searchable through Facebook, and soon turn up on Google, Yahoo and MSN Search.

As of tomorrow, search will be available through Facebook; users will then have one month to change their privacy settings before profiles get indexed by the major search engines. These results will include, at most, your name and profile picture."

Read more...

and here too...

NZ Herald, crime and online communities



NZ Herald explains its readers what Bebo is:

"What exactly is Bebo?
10:25AM Wednesday September 12, 2007
By Stacey Hunt

he question might horrify anyone aged under 20, for whom comments like "Are you on Bebo?" and "Oh yeah, I saw that on your Bebo page" are everyday phrases.

But some of the older generation remain in the dark - 15 per cent of the first 1000 people responding to today's poll on nzherald.co.nz had never heard of social networking sites.

Stacey Hunt explains all about the sites young people just cannot seem to live without.

What is it?

Providing a place where people can spend hours creating their own pages, finding friends, uploading photos and leaving comments for other people, social networking sites have attracted millions of users.

People can post blogs, leave messages for friends, upload photos and videos, adopt virtual pets, feed and play with friends virtual pets, give "luv", draw pictures on whiteboards and the list goes on."

Read more...

And this is why:

Judge issues internet warning in student murder case
A judge has warned people not to discuss the murder of Auckland Grammar School student Augustine Borrell on internet sites after a youth appeared in court today.

The 18-year-old was given name suppression and remanded in custody until next Thursday when his legal team are expected to apply for bail.

Judge Sarah Fleming emphasised the suppression order applied to websites as well as traditional media.

Supporters of the accused were at court this morning and said he was a "good guy".

The judge suppressed all details of the case, including discussion on networking sites.

The youth's arrest came after comments were posted on the popular Bebo website saying "i am real sory 4 tha incident" and "iv handed maself in"."

Read more...

And:

"Exclusive: Police probe murder claims on Bebo"

Read more...

Battle over images of the rugby world cup

TV3 has been fighting to protect its exclusive right to images to rugby world cup and has won.

"TV3 wins injunction against Sky over World Cup coverage
6:01PM Wednesday September 12, 2007
By Edward Gay

MediaWorks, owner of TV3, has won an interim injunction against Sky's coverage of the Rugby World Cup.

TV3 issued proceedings in the High Court today saying it believed Sky was in serious breach of the rules surrounding "fair dealing" in its use of footage.

A full hearing of the injunction will take place on Friday.

The ruling imposes a ban on Sky including TV3 Rugby World Cup footage on The Cup, Rugby Highlights (channel 33) and Sport 365 Highlights."

Read more...

Bill Raltson former TVNZ head of news speaks up

"Ralston criticises Clark for salary fiasco at TVNZ
| Sunday, 9 September 2007

Former TVNZ head of news Bill Ralston has tongue lashed politicians for their handling of the state broadcaster and singled out the Prime Minister for starting a chain of disastrous events.

In a Herald on Sunday opinion piece Ralston broke his silence about TVNZ.

"TVNZ can and does become a political football as puffed-up politicians use it to boost their own profile by grandstanding on its every mistake and attempting to embarrass the Government as a result," he wrote.

Ralston said the duel role of returning a profit and meeting charter obligations was failing; "In short TVNZ is dysfunctional because it's designed that."

Ralston said Prime Minister Helen Clark's position against large salaries for presenters cost the network millions and was a "major factor in bringing the place almost to its knees".

He said her stand against big payouts led to short term contracts which alienated presenters such as Paul Holmes who quit."

Read more...

TVNZ's Financial Results

TVNZ released its budget results:

Fewer viewers blamed for TVNZ loss
By MICHAEL FIELD - The Dominion Post | Tuesday, 11 September 2007

For the first time in its history, Television New Zealand will not be paying a dividend to taxpayers, after posting a $4.5 million loss - blaming shrinking audiences.

Chief executive Rick Ellis conceded the year to June had been a "somewhat monumental year", and while TVNZ forecast a profit next year, warned "we will not return to revenue levels any time soon".

TVNZ's financial results showed that one staff member - believed to be Mr Ellis - is paid between $670,000 and $680,000 a year. Five employees were paid more than $300,000 a year, down from nine last year.

Mr Ellis said TVNZ had made 125 redundancies in the financial year, including 45 people in management or leadership roles. Restructuring had cost $11.1 million, but had delivered future savings of about $17 million a year.

Advertising had softened after four big years, and in the latest financial year had fallen 6.5 per cent because of a drop in audience share."

Read more...

"Maharey defends TVNZ loss
NZPA | Tuesday, 11 September 2007:

Broadcasting Minister Steve Maharey took the flak for TVNZ's $4.5 million annual loss in Parliament today.

Yesterday the state-owned broadcaster released its financial results for the year to June 30, showing it had made an operating profit of $9.3 million on revenue of $375.2 million.

However a major restructure that saw the company shed about 150 staff - many receiving redundancy pay outs - cost the broadcaster $11.1 million, resulting in a $4.5 million loss after tax.

Advertising revenues for the year were down 6.5 percent to $312.8 million."

Read more...

Internet and spying

China denies role in NZ cyber attack
By HANK SCHOUTEN - The Dominion Post | Wednesday, 12 September 2007

The Chinese Government denies it is involved in attempts to hack into New Zealand Government computer systems - despite strong hints that its spies' activities had been detected.

The Security Intelligence Service has confirmed that its staff detected information has been stolen and software installed to take control of computer systems.

Prime Minister Helen Clark said yesterday that she had been assured "no classified information has been at risk at all". She would not elaborate on what was deemed classified information, except to say: "Now we have very smart people to provide protection every time an attack is tried. Obviously we learn from that."

She said officials knew who was responsible for the hacking.

SIS director Warren Tucker has suggested China was the culprit by referring to cyber attacks in Canada and Britain that have been linked to the Chinese military.

China has also been accused of targeting sensitive German, United States and French computer systems, including those in the office of German Chancellor Angela Merkel and US Defence and State Department networks.

Read more...

Wednesday, September 12, 2007

Colin Espiner and new technologies and NZ Politics

From The Press via stuff.co.nz:

"Texting Miss Clark
Colin Espiner in On The House | 11:39 am 11 September 2007

So Damien O’Connor offered his resignation to Prime Minister Helen Clark via text message. Isn’t technology wonderful? It kind of makes Brad Pitt’s dumping of Jennifer Aniston by fax look positively luddite.

Maybe O’Connor knew that Clark was a bit of a text fan. The Prime Minister’s abilities in this area are well known. She texted her parents after almost falling out of a light plane during the last election. She carried on quite a relationship by text with Grant Dalton during the America’s Cup campaign.

As O’Connor himself said this morning, a text message was the one way he knew of getting through to Clark.

One can imagine the conversation went something like:

O’Connor: “Hln sori i stffed up agn. Went bit ott with rgby & all. Shd rsgn. Rgds doc”

Clark: “Gr8 tks doc can use agnst u lata. Stay put 4 now cos cant find any1 else. Lol hc”"

Read more...

Friday, September 7, 2007

Ohio Paper Portrays Iranians As Cockroaches Fleeing Sewer



Read more...

Rugby world cup (the media event) starts


Interesting story about the conflict between the major news agencies and the IRB:

"A high-profile press event featuring Zinedine Zidane and the New Zealand All Blacks was hit today by a media reporting boycott instituted by news and picture agencies over Rugby World Cup coverage rights dispute.
An alliance of five international agencies - which includes Reuters, Associated Press and Agence France Presse - refused to distribute any copy, text or footage of the Adidas event to global media subscribers in a stand-off with governing body the IRB over media restrictions."
Read more...

Monday, September 3, 2007

"Freeview" as public television

An interview with Eric Kearsley from TVNZ that discusses the relationship between the new digital channels, and TVNZ's role as a public broadcaster

Carol Archie interview: Journalism and coverage of "Maori issues"

A National radio interview with Carol Archie, author of 'Pou Korero: Journalists' Guide to Maori and Current Affairs,' that would be excellent preparation for Sue Abel's lecture next week.

See also this discussion of the book launch